Honi Soit
    Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram
    Trending
    • Mohammed Shami: The Muslim cricketer who carried an Islamophobic nation to the Men’s Cricket World Cup Final
    • Moving beyond the theoretical: Privacy law reform in Australia
    • Digital privacy, missing voices, and cookies: IAPP Summit 2023
    • SUDS 2023 Major: A Corpse in the Cabinet — Review
    • In Defence of Studying Useless Degrees
    • “I Don’t Like Living Sometimes”: An Interview with Mark Scott
    • Tensions rise between Arc and Tharunka over editorial processes
    •  ‘Some good old Southern hospitality’: Steel Magnolias at the Genesian Theatre
    • About
    • Print Edition
    • Advertise
    • Locations
    • Contact
    Facebook Instagram X (Twitter) TikTok
    Honi SoitHoni Soit
    Saturday, December 2
    • News
    • Analysis
    • Culture
    • Opinion
    • University
    • Features
    • Perspective
    • Investigation
    • Reviews
    Honi Soit
    Home»Perspective

    A confusion of tongues

    Hing Yee Chan on how speaking perpetuates racial hierarchies in the classroom
    By Hing Yee ChanMay 24, 2018 Perspective 4 Mins Read
    Share
    Facebook Twitter LinkedIn Pinterest Email

    When I added Ancient History as my second major last year, I expected to deepen my understanding about white culture circa 2000 years ago. What I didn’t expect was to learn equally as much about white culture circa now. My biggest takeaway? White culture is speaking before you think.

    You know the type. You’re sitting in the tutorial, notes open, ready to contribute to the discussion and earn some participation marks. The tutor asks a question. You’re ready to put up your hand.

    Then, in butts a mouthy white person who proceeds to regale us with a stream-of-consciousness as bland as their people’s food.

    And they just keep doing this every time anyone else opens their mouth.

    Roman history is a white-dominated subject, and usually I’m the only person of colour – and definitely the only woman of colour – in those tutorial rooms. It’s a disconcerting experience for someone who lives an otherwise racially-diverse reality. It’s in these moments that I become hyper-aware of the racial power hierarchies embedded in academia.

    The tutorial room does not exist in a vacuum. It is located in a society and academic system which foregrounds the white experience, and thus reproduces those racial dynamics by giving white voices precedence over those of students of colour. The discipline of Roman history – like most other academic fields – was founded on white, Western points-of-view and voices. This background is obviously understandable, but it is untenable in an age when certain individuals and collectives co-opt this our field to build their own narratives of white supremacy.

    So, why then is it important to have people of colour–and particularly women of colour–speak in the tutorial environment?

    By virtue of our uniquely different life experiences, we have a distinct perspective on reality. For instance, students who inherit the legacy of colonialism have different takes on imperialism. Tutorials are spaces for students to share these perspectives and, true to the academic ideal of the tutorial, challenge existing assumptions. We should have access to different viewpoints – not just the one white perspective’s.

    Moreover, and particularly for people of colour in a white-dominated subject, there are certain racial assumptions regarding to whom the field “belongs”, or who can more legitimately speak about it. The tutorial is a space where we can challenge paternalistic assumptions about where our voices belong in academia by asserting our active participation in it.

    Non-white voices also disrupt white-majority spaces and assumptions. It’s easy for white people to pretend that we don’t exist and speak over us or hold onto blinkered white views. In one of my tutorials, a white boy put up his hand and actually asked, “Why did the [indigenous] North African tribes hate Carthage [a Phoenician colony in North Africa] so much?” When we can speak up, however, we force white people to first consider our existence and experiences before spouting such asinine remarks.

    So, I say to white people: rethink how you continue to dominate space and time in the learning environment. Consider stepping back to allow more diverse voices to come through. Listen to people of colour and support them when they speak. This will benefit everyone’s learning.

    Tutors, white or not, consider what role you play in perpetuating racial hierarchies in academic environments. Watch out for who speaks more than others. Support and encourage the voices of those who aren’t heard as much in our society.

    And to my fellow people of colour, I say this: I understand that we can’t always speak up. It’s taxing and perhaps not always in our ability. But those who can, and those who so desperately want to but have been rebuffed by a white peer who won’t shut up: persist. Your voice is valuable.

    If it’s any encouragement at all, know that whenever you speak, a white person has to shut up.

    This article appeared in the autonomous ACAR edition, ACAR Honi 2018.

    ACAR Honi racial heirarchies racism speaking up tutorial participation

    Keep Reading

    In Defence of Studying Useless Degrees

    Migraine: more than just a headache

    Love knows no boundaries on the Spectrum

    Behind closed doors: I think you should get high with Tim Robinson

    Vale JL

    The Body and the Knife: Sex, Self-Esteem, and Disintegration

    Just In

    Mohammed Shami: The Muslim cricketer who carried an Islamophobic nation to the Men’s Cricket World Cup Final

    December 1, 2023

    Moving beyond the theoretical: Privacy law reform in Australia

    November 30, 2023

    Digital privacy, missing voices, and cookies: IAPP Summit 2023

    November 30, 2023

    SUDS 2023 Major: A Corpse in the Cabinet — Review

    November 30, 2023
    Editor's Picks

    Puff, puff, pass: What does cannabis legalisation mean for student communities?

    November 1, 2023

    Privacy is not dead, yet

    October 26, 2023

    ‘A patchwork quilt of repression’: The disappearing right to protest in NSW

    October 17, 2023

    The lights are on, but no one’s home: inside USyd’s International House

    October 10, 2023
    Facebook Instagram X (Twitter) TikTok

    From the mines

    • News
    • Analysis
    • Higher Education
    • Culture
    • Features
    • Investigation
    • Comedy
    • Editorials
    • Letters
    • Misc

     

    • Opinion
    • Perspective
    • Profiles
    • Reviews
    • Science
    • Social
    • Sport
    • SRC Reports
    • Tech

    Admin

    • About
    • Editors
    • Send an Anonymous Tip
    • Write/Produce/Create For Us
    • Print Edition
    • Locations
    • Archive
    • Advertise in Honi Soit
    • Contact Us

    We acknowledge the traditional custodians of this land, the Gadigal people of the Eora Nation. The University of Sydney – where we write, publish and distribute Honi Soit – is on the sovereign land of these people. As students and journalists, we recognise our complicity in the ongoing colonisation of Indigenous land. In recognition of our privilege, we vow to not only include, but to prioritise and centre the experiences of Indigenous people, and to be reflective when we fail to be a counterpoint to the racism that plagues the mainstream media.

    © 2023 Honi Soit
    • Privacy Policy
    • Terms
    • Accessibility

    Type above and press Enter to search. Press Esc to cancel.