Honi Soit
    Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram
    Trending
    • CAPA Board Passes Motion Removing SUPRA Voting Rights 
    • The momentary victory of mass politics: reflections on Kissinger and Australia
    • “We are freedom fighters”: pro-Palestinian protestors march amidst end to seven-day ceasefire
    • An invitation in: SCA’s ‘New Contemporaries’
    • NTEU to delay new fixed-term contract limits that fail to cover higher-education workers
    • Mohammed Shami: The Muslim cricketer who carried an Islamophobic nation to the Men’s Cricket World Cup Final
    • Moving beyond the theoretical: Privacy law reform in Australia
    • Digital privacy, missing voices, and cookies: IAPP Summit 2023
    • About
    • Print Edition
    • Advertise
    • Locations
    • Contact
    Facebook Instagram X (Twitter) TikTok
    Honi SoitHoni Soit
    Thursday, December 7
    • News
    • Analysis
    • Culture
    • Opinion
    • University
    • Features
    • Perspective
    • Investigation
    • Reviews
    Honi Soit
    Home»Opinion

    PO(ID)C: Why the label isn’t a one-size-fits-all in anti-racist activism

    Although POC as an identity label may be comforting, we must think more deeply on how we use them.
    By Alana RamshawMay 9, 2022 Opinion 5 Mins Read
    Art by Alana Ramshaw.
    Share
    Facebook Twitter LinkedIn Pinterest Email

    It can’t be denied that identity labels can be positive things. They offer a sense of belonging on a personal level, and they offer a sense of unity that activists can cohere and organise around on a political level. Angela Davis, in Women Race and Class, penned essays such as Black Women and the Club Movement, highlighting the racist cultures and political underpinnings of early 20th century feminist organising spaces. Davis’ critiques of such movements can be easily invoked as an argument in favour of autonomous organising spaces, if not for a nominal distinction between white and non-white feminist activists (and people at large) more broadly. 

    In many instances, the label of ‘people of colour’ (POC from here on out) brings people together both politically and interpersonally. In other instances it assists people in navigating their intersecting identities and their place in the world. It can also, however, ignore and homogenise the diversity that exists within it.

    The nuance and implications of the POC label cannot be understood without first an understanding of the thing it distances people who adopt it from – whiteness. Whiteness, however, carries different meanings in different contexts and applications. Whether it is delineated along lines of skin tone, structural privilege, or geographical and genetic heritage depends on who you ask and what mood they’re in.

    Aileen Moreton-Robinson in The White Possessive identifies whiteness as inseparable from possession and dispossession. It is, to her, linked back to ownership, property, and all of their respective socio-political and economic implications. It has a frenetic fixation on expansion, consumption and occupation. In a broad sense, it is imperial.

    In the face of such an imperial phenomenon, does distancing through the adoption of the label of POC amount to anything more than the cultivation of a political brand? Is it a powerful and politically utile rejection of the harms and ideological underpinnings of whiteness? Does it function to absolve us as individuals of political guilt and work that we should rightly assume? 

    Karan Saxena, in their article Brown people’s proximity to whiteness can bolster white supremacy and Islamophobia too, argues that being racialised “does not absolve you from taking part in upholding white supremacy”. Proximity to whiteness is, in the words of a friend sitting across from me in a harshly-lit Fisher study room as I write this article, “internalising and benefiting from systems of white supremacy”. Proximity to whiteness can manifest in many different ways, from having light-coloured skin and eurocentric features to having the structural privileges of economic wealth in a foundationally racist society and economy. We do not necessarily choose to benefit from it, but I believe we have a responsibility to be aware of it and dismantle it wherever it exists within us.

    Last week I attended the 2022 run of USyd POC Revue, and found myself thinking more deeply about a particular sketch than would be considered normal or healthy. The premise of the sketch was simple. Its protagonist, Jessica, sat cross legged centre-stage, laptop open in front of her, filling out an application to audition for POC Revue. The skit’s only other two characters, an ‘angel’ and a ‘devil’, stood on the stage balcony above Jessica, debating the validity of her identity as a person of colour.

    “Of course she’s POC, her mum is Chinese!”, proclaimed the angel.

    “But her dad is white!”, the devil rebutted.

    The sketch descends into light-hearted quips about Chinese stereotypes, until the devil delivers their final blow: 

    “You’re forgetting the most crucial thing, she gets asked ‘where are you from?’ all the time.”

    “Yeah, and she enjoys it!”.

    In a white society that places different value judgments on different kinds of people of colour, there is social, political and economic utility in being one of the good ones. There is an aspirational goal to be found in being one of the exotic ones rather than one who supposedly doesn’t belong. In being one of the well-behaved ones rather than one of the uncooperative ones. In being one of the ones who speak English fluently with an Australian accent rather than one of the ones who are ‘a bit hard to understand’. The list goes on. 

    There are innumerable ways of being a person of colour, and we can’t ignore that some of them are easier and more reliant on systems of white supremacy than others.

    I am not arguing for the wholesale retirement of the term POC or its variations just yet. I am instead proposing that we think more deeply and more intentionally about the ways it is invoked and to what ends. Just as all racialised peoples have different experiences and conceptions of the world they navigate, they will also have different opinions on identity labels and different perspectives on their value, and to that they are entitled. However, I believe that no matter what the struggle for liberation from white supremacy looks like, getting there will require more than an acronym to look like liberation for all of us.

    acar honi 2022 Identity politics poc racial politics

    Keep Reading

    Long live the Intifada: Defend the right to stand in solidarity with Palestine 

    This essay thinks, therefore, it is: A defence of first person in academic writing

    Bil rouh, Bil dam, Nafdika ya Falasteen

    Unity on whose terms?

    Route to Respect

    Because It Is My Name!

    Just In

    CAPA Board Passes Motion Removing SUPRA Voting Rights 

    December 7, 2023

    The momentary victory of mass politics: reflections on Kissinger and Australia

    December 6, 2023

    “We are freedom fighters”: pro-Palestinian protestors march amidst end to seven-day ceasefire

    December 4, 2023

    An invitation in: SCA’s ‘New Contemporaries’

    December 4, 2023
    Editor's Picks

    Puff, puff, pass: What does cannabis legalisation mean for student communities?

    November 1, 2023

    Privacy is not dead, yet

    October 26, 2023

    ‘A patchwork quilt of repression’: The disappearing right to protest in NSW

    October 17, 2023

    The lights are on, but no one’s home: inside USyd’s International House

    October 10, 2023
    Facebook Instagram X (Twitter) TikTok

    From the mines

    • News
    • Analysis
    • Higher Education
    • Culture
    • Features
    • Investigation
    • Comedy
    • Editorials
    • Letters
    • Misc

     

    • Opinion
    • Perspective
    • Profiles
    • Reviews
    • Science
    • Social
    • Sport
    • SRC Reports
    • Tech

    Admin

    • About
    • Editors
    • Send an Anonymous Tip
    • Write/Produce/Create For Us
    • Print Edition
    • Locations
    • Archive
    • Advertise in Honi Soit
    • Contact Us

    We acknowledge the traditional custodians of this land, the Gadigal people of the Eora Nation. The University of Sydney – where we write, publish and distribute Honi Soit – is on the sovereign land of these people. As students and journalists, we recognise our complicity in the ongoing colonisation of Indigenous land. In recognition of our privilege, we vow to not only include, but to prioritise and centre the experiences of Indigenous people, and to be reflective when we fail to be a counterpoint to the racism that plagues the mainstream media.

    © 2023 Honi Soit
    • Privacy Policy
    • Terms
    • Accessibility

    Type above and press Enter to search. Press Esc to cancel.