Close Menu
Honi Soit
    Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram
    Trending
    • جذوري my roots
    • Patterns of a War-Torn Conscience: Towards a Healing Conceptualisation of Praxis
    • Enmore Psychogeography
    • The night has its own logic
    • Yield
    • Microsoft OneNote is the Digital Note Taking App for All YourDevices
    • Be my fly
    • Truth, heritage, and cultural belonging in the Irish diaspora
    • About
    • Print Edition
    • Student Journalism Conference 2025
    • Writing Comp
    • Advertise
    • Locations
    • Contact
    Facebook Instagram X (Twitter) TikTok
    Honi SoitHoni Soit
    Friday, May 16
    • News
    • Analysis
    • Culture
    • Opinion
    • University
    • Features
    • Perspective
    • Investigation
    • Reviews
    • Comedy
    • Student Journalism Conference 2025
    Honi Soit
    Home»Opinion

    Gender and capitalism

    By April HolcombeSeptember 29, 2016 Opinion 5 Mins Read
    Share
    Facebook Twitter LinkedIn Pinterest Email
    Before we take our first breath of air, society sets out a path that we must follow. Before we know our own name, others presume to know a whole lot about us. The rigid gender binary is everywhere, and transgression is punished through social exclusion and institutional discrimination.

    Gender is a category (like race, nationality, sexual desire) which is constructed and shaped by the way people interact with each other. As people organise their societies and their economies in different ways at different times, their familial and sexual relations change with them.

    So how is our society organised?

    Capitalist society is predicated on a tiny minority owning and controlling the vast wealth of the world. Production is geared towards what will create the most profits for this minority, not what the mass of people actually needs. The rich throw these products onto an unplanned market, hoping to sell them for the highest possible return. Profits rule the world: to maximize them, the bosses must squeeze every last drop of work out of us at the lowest possible cost. Making workers work harder for less is a central concern of the employing class. All of this requires iron discipline and subordination in the workplace. Workers must have their every movement controlled for efficiency. They must be made dependent on their wage for survival.

    With such intense and inhuman social relations, the nuclear family glues us to the capitalist
    project. A private place cut off from 9-to-5 industrial servitude can feel like a sanctuary – husbands might feel more powerful directing wives and children than they do following orders – but they are also disciplined by dependents at home who rely on their wage to live.

    Then there’s the work conducted inside the home. Cooking, washing, raising children and
    caring for the sick is essential for a society to exist. Under capitalism, it keeps workers replenished each day for another round of labour, and children prepared for the discipline of school and work. Rather than being a social responsibility, these tasks are part of the
    private, unpaid labour that is done overwhelmingly by women in the home. The Australian Bureau of Statistics calculated the value of this domestic labour as equivalent to half of Australia’s GDP. This is not a bill that the bosses and politicians want to pay.

    Such a profitable institution requires extreme socialisation into the expected roles from day one. By the time young people enter the workforce, years of intense gendering has steered them towards certain industries and work-patterns. Once in the workforce, they find that women are paid significantly less than their male counterparts, which in turn reinforces the gendered nature of social and family life.

    The mass social movements for sexual liberation of the 60s and 70s have changed this situation considerably. Though still unequal, men do more housework and childcare than they once did. The stigma surrounding single mothers and divorce has lessened. LGBTI rights have internationally made enormous gains on marriage equality and adoption rights. All of this is positive, but it also demonstrates that when social pressure threatens to blow the lid off the status quo, the system can accommodate alternative family arrangements. These are fitted around the nuclear norm and in so doing adapt oppression to new circumstances. For all the changes, the private family continues to be a closed-off unit that throws the cost of keeping a healthy, exploitable workforce onto workers themselves. For the individuals in it, updated gender stereotypes and expectations that fit with this reality are no less oppressive.
    The family simultaneously limits our horizons and too often denies us a genuinely fulfilling
    existence. We work in order to support family members, but then work prevents us from developing these relationships satisfactorily. Rather than liberating and pleasurable sex lives, we are tired and bitter after work, too busy cooking or fixing the washing machine to enjoy our bodies. The market turns our desires into products it can sell for a buck: the $50 billion pornography and sex industry are about attaining the idealised, commodified experience of pleasure. Sexual repression for working class people is necessary to prove – as sexist advertising does from every billboard – that our bodies are not our own.

    Only in a society in which human satisfaction comes before the profits of a tiny few can there
    be genuine liberation and freedom from the pressure to conform to gender roles. That means overthrowing the class of parasites who demand our subordination in every area of life. Sex is a basic human need for which consent should be the only rule, not the ability to buy it, find time for it, or any other consideration. Similarly, raising children is a social good that should be the collective responsibility of all, rather than the private, unpaid duty of exhausted parents.
    Capitalism domestic labour exploitation family gender gender roles the market workforce

    Keep Reading

    Capitalism Won’t Save You

    Liberal Strongholds now Teal Havens?

    A Debate in the Heat of Elections

    Independents Day: How the Teals Could Win Big at the Next Election

    Artificial academia

    Research With My Own Eyes

    Just In

    جذوري my roots

    May 16, 2025

    Patterns of a War-Torn Conscience: Towards a Healing Conceptualisation of Praxis

    May 16, 2025

    Enmore Psychogeography

    May 16, 2025

    The night has its own logic

    May 16, 2025
    Editor's Picks

    A meditation on God and the impossible pursuit of answers

    May 14, 2025

    We Will Be Remembered As More Than Administrative Errors

    May 7, 2025

    NSW universities in the red as plague of cuts hit students & staff

    April 30, 2025

    Your Compliance Will Not Save You

    April 16, 2025
    Facebook Instagram X (Twitter) TikTok

    From the mines

    • News
    • Analysis
    • Higher Education
    • Culture
    • Features
    • Investigation
    • Comedy
    • Editorials
    • Letters
    • Misc

     

    • Opinion
    • Perspective
    • Profiles
    • Reviews
    • Science
    • Social
    • Sport
    • SRC Reports
    • Tech

    Admin

    • About
    • Editors
    • Send an Anonymous Tip
    • Write/Produce/Create For Us
    • Print Edition
    • Locations
    • Archive
    • Advertise in Honi Soit
    • Contact Us

    We acknowledge the traditional custodians of this land, the Gadigal people of the Eora Nation. The University of Sydney – where we write, publish and distribute Honi Soit – is on the sovereign land of these people. As students and journalists, we recognise our complicity in the ongoing colonisation of Indigenous land. In recognition of our privilege, we vow to not only include, but to prioritise and centre the experiences of Indigenous people, and to be reflective when we fail to be a counterpoint to the racism that plagues the mainstream media.

    © 2025 Honi Soit
    • Privacy Policy
    • Terms
    • Accessibility

    Type above and press Enter to search. Press Esc to cancel.