Close Menu
Honi Soit
    Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram
    Trending
    • Akinola Davies Jr. on My Father’s Shadow, Namesakes, and Nostalgia: An Interview
    • Into the Blue: Underwater Robots Unveil the Secrets of Norfolk Island’s Deep
    • Ancient Reef Cores Reveal Fragile Future for the Great Barrier Reef
    • Bach, Handel, Scarlatti, and Rameau walk into the Oldest Sydney Church
    • The Raftsmen: An Interview with Dr. Chadden Hunter — Sydney Film Festival Exclusive
    • The Anarchy 1138-53: to play or to plunder?
    • The Wrong Gods Review: Sacred Soil and Shifting Futures
    • Romeo & Juliet Review: Where Love Lingers and Time Unfolds
    • About
    • Print Edition
    • Student Journalism Conference 2025
    • Writing Comp
    • Advertise
    • Locations
    • Contact
    Facebook Instagram X (Twitter) TikTok
    Honi SoitHoni Soit
    Friday, June 13
    • News
    • Analysis
    • Culture
    • Opinion
    • University
    • Features
    • Perspective
    • Investigation
    • Reviews
    • Comedy
    • Student Journalism Conference 2025
    Honi Soit
    Home»News»Education

    Assessment weightings to be capped at 60%

    The review considered student comments that “assessment is overwhelming, poorly communicated and not clearly linked to learning outcomes.”
    By Jeffrey KhooNovember 16, 2021 Education 3 Mins Read
    Share
    Facebook Twitter LinkedIn Pinterest Email

    The University of Sydney will cap most assessment weightings at 60% and seek to avoid “over-assessment,” overhauling its assessment strategy in a move which drew criticism for increasing staff workloads.

    At a meeting today, the Academic Board passed multiple recommendations from its Thematic Review 2021, titled “The Quality of Assessment at the University of Sydney.”

    The review considered student comments that “assessment is overwhelming, poorly communicated and not clearly linked to learning outcomes.” 

    While recent Unit of Study surveys have shown improvements, USyd consistently ranks last on assessment and feedback metrics within the Group of Eight universities, and performs poorly against other Australian universities. 

    In the review, USyd attributes this negative response to a “lasting” or “magnified” impact of a poor experience of assessment or feedback.

    The review recommended that assessment tasks apart from research projects have a maximum weighting of 60%, after finding that “students did not respond well to excessive memorising and assessments weighted 80%-100%” and preferred multiple tasks throughout the semester. About 9% of final exams in Semester 1, 2021 (84 of 928) had a weighting of 60% or more.

    It cautioned that assessment weightings needed to be proportional to the effort required from students for the task, decrying the use of minor 2-3% assessments which had the same workload as 40-50% assessments in the same unit. 

    Although the 60% cap passed without dissent, Honi understands that some academics in Sydney Law School, which often relies on heavily-weighted final exams, were strongly opposed.

    Academics were concerned about a lack of consultation in the process, as well as the new requirement being unsuitable to individual faculties and schools.

    Other recommendations included avoiding “over-assessment” across majors and courses, and encouraging “authentic assessments” that focus on applying knowledge to problems that are found in disciplinary and professional contexts.

    This means a stronger pivot towards “projects, investigations and report writing” over traditional exams, citing the introduction of heavily-criticised interdisciplinary and Industry and Community Project Units (ICPUs) as an example.

    The review claimed that “students did enjoy group work as a way to make friends and build a professional network,” potentially flagging more group projects in students’ futures. 

    Feedback was an important issue for the review, which highlighted that students wanted “greater timeliness, clarity, consistency and transparency” around marking guidelines and rubrics, including clearer instructions and sample practice questions before exams.

    However, a recommendation of collegial peer review, where academics review each others’ assessment tasks to increase  “authentic assessments,” was criticised as requiring major increases in resourcing.

    Academic Board members were concerned that the burden would fall upon “the amazing increasing workloads of staff to improve the student experience,” especially for casual staff.

    The review mentioned staff workload in just two paragraphs, saying that assessment design “needs to be understood as a component of workload.” Rachael Weiss, University Quality Manager who also presented the review to the Academic Board, added that “it would be ideal to give students individualised feedback in addition to [general feedback], but we just don’t have the resources.”

    The Academic Board conducts a Thematic Review into a different issue each year. Previous Thematic Reviews have focused on Student Safety and Wellbeing (2018), Student Placements, Internships and Research Projects (2019), and English Language Pathways and Support (2020).

    “I’m happy that assessment was being reviewed and that both quality and quantity is being reconsidered,” said SRC President Swapnik Sanagavarapu, who sat on the panel for the review.

    The University will begin implementing the recommendations immediately, with a more detailed implementation plan to be presented to the Academic Board in March 2022.

    academic board assessments exams

    Keep Reading

    UTS bans indoor protests

    Macquarie University cuts at least 50 jobs

    1 in 3 men  have used intimate partner violence, according to AIFS research

    Chau Chak Wing Museum to partner with the 25th edition of the Biennale of Sydney

    University of Melbourne expels two students, suspends two more after pro-Palestine protests

    Minimum wage and award minimum wages to rise by 3.5 per cent

    Just In

    Akinola Davies Jr. on My Father’s Shadow, Namesakes, and Nostalgia: An Interview

    June 11, 2025

    Into the Blue: Underwater Robots Unveil the Secrets of Norfolk Island’s Deep

    June 11, 2025

    Ancient Reef Cores Reveal Fragile Future for the Great Barrier Reef

    June 11, 2025

    Bach, Handel, Scarlatti, and Rameau walk into the Oldest Sydney Church

    June 11, 2025
    Editor's Picks

    Part One: The Tale of the Corporate University

    May 28, 2025

    “Thank you Conspiracy!” says Capitalism, as it survives another day

    May 21, 2025

    A meditation on God and the impossible pursuit of answers

    May 14, 2025

    We Will Be Remembered As More Than Administrative Errors

    May 7, 2025
    Facebook Instagram X (Twitter) TikTok

    From the mines

    • News
    • Analysis
    • Higher Education
    • Culture
    • Features
    • Investigation
    • Comedy
    • Editorials
    • Letters
    • Misc

     

    • Opinion
    • Perspective
    • Profiles
    • Reviews
    • Science
    • Social
    • Sport
    • SRC Reports
    • Tech

    Admin

    • About
    • Editors
    • Send an Anonymous Tip
    • Write/Produce/Create For Us
    • Print Edition
    • Locations
    • Archive
    • Advertise in Honi Soit
    • Contact Us

    We acknowledge the traditional custodians of this land, the Gadigal people of the Eora Nation. The University of Sydney – where we write, publish and distribute Honi Soit – is on the sovereign land of these people. As students and journalists, we recognise our complicity in the ongoing colonisation of Indigenous land. In recognition of our privilege, we vow to not only include, but to prioritise and centre the experiences of Indigenous people, and to be reflective when we fail to be a counterpoint to the racism that plagues the mainstream media.

    © 2025 Honi Soit
    • Privacy Policy
    • Terms
    • Accessibility

    Type above and press Enter to search. Press Esc to cancel.