Close Menu
Honi Soit
    Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram
    Trending
    • Skank Sinatra Review: Electric, hilarious, and open-hearted
    • Spacey Jane’s  ‘If That Makes Sense’ and Keeping Australian Music Alive
    • Trump administration issues executive order closing CIA black sites, convinced they are “woke” /Satire
    • “Lawfare”: Jewish staff and students rally behind USyd academics now facing federal legal action
    • Interview with Plestia Alaqad on ‘The Eyes of Gaza’
    • Whose Review Is It Anyway?: NUTS’ WPIIA 2025
    •  “Like diaspora, pollen needs to be scattered to different places to survive and grow”: Dual Opening of ‘Germinate/Propagate/Bloom’, and ‘Last Call’ at 4A Centre of Contemporary Asian Art
    • Akinola Davies Jr. on ‘My Father’s Shadow’, Namesakes, and Nostalgia
    • About
    • Print Edition
    • Student Journalism Conference 2025
    • Writing Comp
    • Advertise
    • Locations
    • Contact
    Facebook Instagram X (Twitter) TikTok
    Honi SoitHoni Soit
    Sunday, June 22
    • News
    • Analysis
    • Culture
    • Opinion
    • University
    • Features
    • Perspective
    • Investigation
    • Reviews
    • Comedy
    • Student Journalism Conference 2025
    Honi Soit
    Home»News

    NSW Anti-protest laws under departmental review: open letter demands transparency.

    In an open letter, civil rights organisations have called for the government to repeal “anti-democratic” NSW anti-protest laws, or failing that, introduce “a community consultation component into the statutory review of the 2022 amendments.”
    By Zeina Khochaiche and Aidan Elwig PollockApril 7, 2024 News 3 Mins Read
    Credit: New South Wales Council for Civil Liberties
    Share
    Facebook Twitter LinkedIn Pinterest Email

    In an open letter, civil rights organisations have called for the government to repeal “anti-democratic”  NSW anti-protest laws, or failing that, introduce “a community consultation component into the statutory review of the 2022 amendments.”

    The 2022 legislation amended section 144G of the Roads Act 1993 to ban “illegal protesting” on all “main roads,” carrying a maximum fine of $22,000 and/or a two year jail sentence. The controversial laws have been under legislative review behind closed doors since April 1. 

    The letter, published by New South Wales Council for Civil Liberties (NSWCCL), described these laws as “draconian” and demanded the NSW premier and legal advisors protect the “fundamental democratic right […] to express our views, shape our societies, and press for social change” that protesting allows.

    “It is essential that members of the community, civil society organisations, legal experts, protesters and protest movements and other stakeholders are given the opportunity to publicly explain the grassroots impacts of these laws,” the letter said. 

    “As part of a healthy democracy the government should invite comment and critique from the community about its laws,” said NSWCCL President Lydia Shelly, “this review of the Anti-Protest legislation should be open and transparent to reflect our government’s commitment to open debate.”

    “The diversity of the organisations that have signed the open letter is significant,” an NSWCCL spokesperson said, “it evidences the grave concerns that are held by civil society organisations, unions, faith bodies, environmental and human rights organisations.”

    The open letter was penned by 38 union, advocacy and civil society organisations and unions including Human Rights Act NSW, Jews Against the Occupation 48’, Amnesty International, and the NSW Teachers Federation.

    The Anti-protest laws were hastily introduced in 2022 by current  leader of NSW Liberal Party, Mark Speakman, in response to expected climate protests in June of that year and to mitigate “major disruptions to the New South Wales transport networks.”

    The laws have allegedly been used to charge protestors involved in peaceful protests at Port Botany, according to Secretary of the Maritime Union of Australia (MUA) Sydney Branch Paul Keating. 

    “MUA members are amongst 42 people charged under these laws for participating in peaceful protests at Port Botany, including members from 6 different unions, who are now facing the possibility of enormous fines, criminal records, and prison sentences,” Keating said. 

    Vice-President of Young Labor Adam Connor said that “since the Labor Party supported these laws in opposition, we have seen young people arrested and charged while exercising their fundamental right to protest,” and called for the “anti-democratic laws” to be repealed.

    Climate protestor Violet Coco was sentenced to 15 months of jail time under the legislation in a controversial trial in 2022. Coco’s protest, which involved blocking one lane of traffic on Sydney Harbour Bridge, lasted only 28 minutes. 

    NSW Nature Conservation Council CEO Jacqui Mumford noted that “our laws now heavily favour those wanting to wreck our climate and destroy what’s left of our critical ecosystems, rather than citizens exercising their democratic right to peaceful protest.”

    The results of the legislation’s anticipated review are expected to be delivered in parliament in October.

    A petition accompanying the open letter has also been published by the NSWCCL.

    anti protest laws NSWCCL open letter protest

    Keep Reading

    “Lawfare”: Jewish staff and students rally behind USyd academics now facing federal legal action

    UTS bans indoor protests

    Macquarie University cuts at least 50 jobs

    1 in 3 men  have used intimate partner violence, according to AIFS research

    Chau Chak Wing Museum to partner with the 25th edition of the Biennale of Sydney

    University of Melbourne expels two students, suspends two more after pro-Palestine protests

    Just In

    Skank Sinatra Review: Electric, hilarious, and open-hearted

    June 20, 2025

    Spacey Jane’s  ‘If That Makes Sense’ and Keeping Australian Music Alive

    June 20, 2025

    Trump administration issues executive order closing CIA black sites, convinced they are “woke” /Satire

    June 19, 2025

    “Lawfare”: Jewish staff and students rally behind USyd academics now facing federal legal action

    June 19, 2025
    Editor's Picks

    Part One: The Tale of the Corporate University

    May 28, 2025

    “Thank you Conspiracy!” says Capitalism, as it survives another day

    May 21, 2025

    A meditation on God and the impossible pursuit of answers

    May 14, 2025

    We Will Be Remembered As More Than Administrative Errors

    May 7, 2025
    Facebook Instagram X (Twitter) TikTok

    From the mines

    • News
    • Analysis
    • Higher Education
    • Culture
    • Features
    • Investigation
    • Comedy
    • Editorials
    • Letters
    • Misc

     

    • Opinion
    • Perspective
    • Profiles
    • Reviews
    • Science
    • Social
    • Sport
    • SRC Reports
    • Tech

    Admin

    • About
    • Editors
    • Send an Anonymous Tip
    • Write/Produce/Create For Us
    • Print Edition
    • Locations
    • Archive
    • Advertise in Honi Soit
    • Contact Us

    We acknowledge the traditional custodians of this land, the Gadigal people of the Eora Nation. The University of Sydney – where we write, publish and distribute Honi Soit – is on the sovereign land of these people. As students and journalists, we recognise our complicity in the ongoing colonisation of Indigenous land. In recognition of our privilege, we vow to not only include, but to prioritise and centre the experiences of Indigenous people, and to be reflective when we fail to be a counterpoint to the racism that plagues the mainstream media.

    © 2025 Honi Soit
    • Privacy Policy
    • Terms
    • Accessibility

    Type above and press Enter to search. Press Esc to cancel.