University said withholding documents about on-campus sexual assault attack was in the ‘public interest’
EXCLUSIVE: Honi has obtained the letter sent by the University of Sydney to NSW Police, arguing that keeping footage of an alleged assault on campus was in the 'public interest'
Content warning: sexual assault
A letter obtained by Honi reveals the University of Sydney objected to police releasing information about an attempted assault on campus last year in the name of “public interest”.
CCTV footage of the attack, obtained by Channel 7 News, was released by NSW Police last night. In the video, a young woman is walking through a carpark when a man grabs her, covers her mouth and pushes her between two cars, allegedly attempting to assault her.
Nina Funnell, a journalist and advocate against sexual assault, identified the crime as taking place at USyd and revealed the footage was only obtained after the University failed to lodge a formal appeal against Channel 7’s Freedom of Information request.
Honi has obtained the letter initially objecting to the release of information about the case, which was sent to NSW Police in August 2016.
With Vice Chancellor Michael Spence’s authorisation, University Group Secretary Alex Maitland wrote that the University believes “there are overriding public interest reasons against disclosure of the documents and objects to release of the information”.
The letter states that as some of the information contained within the documents was provided confidentially by individuals to staff at the University, “to disclose any information provided in confidence by those individuals … could reasonably be expected to result in a loss of trust in the services provided by the University”.
They warned that this loss of trust could “reasonably be expected to result in students and staff being reluctant to seek support from the services offered by the University”.
The letter also says, “the overriding public interest lies in the protection of the privacy of individuals.”
“The documents contain personal information of a particularly sensitive nature. Students, staff and members of the public who interact with the University … would not expect to see extracts of records relating to themselves made available to the public,” they wrote.
“The records contain specific details regarding each event or allegation, such as the location, time, nature of the assault and sometimes information about other persons involved in the events.”
“Disclosure of this information could provide enough information to enable individuals to be identified by others who have some knowledge of the events contained in the reports.”
However, a screenshot of the police report for the case, obtained by Channel 7 through FOI, shows that police wanted to release footage and details of the case to media to help identify the attacker if they weren’t otherwise able to.
The screenshot reads, “CCTV footage provides excellent shot of POI’s face, suitable for identification. Nemesis stills have already been distributed. In the event that he is not identified from the nemesis email, police will consider a media release. The Footage depicts the actual offence taking place, and is quite shocking. It would have a strong appeal to television news networks. Contact victim and Sydney University before undertaking this option.”
All names and other identifying information were fully redacted by NSW Police before they released documents to Channel 7.
The University reached out to Honi with a statement reiterating the views expressed in Maitland’s letter and stating that they “[have] never been asked, and therefore never expressed a view, about the release of video footage related to assaults on campus.”
If you or someone you know has been impacted by sexual assault, support is available at 1800 RESPECT on 1800 737 732.