Close Menu
Honi Soit
    Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram
    Trending
    • Strawmanning in the chat at the July SRC Council
    • Folk Reimagined, East In Symphony at the Sydney Opera House
    • Graeme Turner’s ‘Broken’ assesses our ailing university sector
    • MAPW addresses USyd’s retreat from “obligation to promote peace” in open letter
    • 2025–26 State Budget Unpacked
    • Antisemitism review puts universities, festivals, and cultural centres under threat
    • Macquarie University axes Sociology, cuts more jobs & courses
    • UTS elects new Chancellor
    • About
    • Print Edition
    • Student Journalism Conference 2025
    • Writing Comp
    • Advertise
    • Locations
    • Contact
    Facebook Instagram X (Twitter) TikTok
    Honi SoitHoni Soit
    Wednesday, July 16
    • News
    • Analysis
    • Culture
    • Opinion
    • University
    • Features
    • Perspective
    • Investigation
    • Reviews
    • Comedy
    • Student Journalism Conference 2025
    Honi Soit
    Home»News

    Vice-Chancellor Spence grilled at Academic Board

    Students have few other opportunities to take the Vice-Chancellor to task in person.
    By Siobhan RyanMay 9, 2017 News 3 Mins Read
    Share
    Facebook Twitter LinkedIn Pinterest Email

    Students questioned Vice Chancellor Michael Spence about how the University will respond to huge cuts to university funding in the 2017 Federal Budget at a meeting of the Academic Board on Tuesday, May 2.

    The proposed changes will increase the cost of most degrees and force students to pay back their HECS debt earlier as the repayment threshold is lowered to $42,000 annually.

    The day before the meeting, Education Minister Simon Birmingham attacked the salaries of university vice chancellors, of which Spence’s is the highest.

    According to the Australian Financial Review, Spence receives $1,385,000 per year, which is more than the salaries of the prime minister, most senior public servants, and the UK’s best remunerated vice chancellor, Oxford University’s Louise Richardson.

    When  asked if the University would consider directing funds from salaries to mitigate the effects of the cuts on students, Spence said, “the University has a contractual obligation to its staff to pay them” what they have been promised, but that “certainly we will be looking at what we need to do to mitigate the effects on students”.

    He also said the  story about his pay “was directly fed from the minister’s office to the press” to create a “smokescreen” for Birmingham’s cuts.

    Of course, this was itself an attempt to throw the focus back onto Birmingham’s cuts just as Birmingham had tried to deflect from them — the facts remain that Spence is paid a large salary and that Birmingham is proposing huge cuts to higher education.

    The main points Spence emphasised throughout the meeting were the impact of cost of living on students and that “Anything that costs students more without benefitting universities is in principle [bad] policy”.

    Honi also asked if he thought lowering the HECS repayment threshold would worsen the hardships already faced by low-SES students as a result of the high cost of living in Sydney. He responded, “I think beginning to repay at $42,000 is too soon”.

    He raised particular concerns for students he described as being in a “poverty trap … where they don’t qualify for financial assistance but for whom life is still really difficult”.

    Yet Spence did not specify what he believed would be a reasonable level of income for graduates to begin repaying their loans.

    In much the same way, Universities Australia and the Group of Eight have criticised funding cuts, while remaining largely silent on the repayment threshold, which will hurt students most.

    Faculty of Arts and Social Sciences representative Georgia Mantle asked whether the University would look into increasing scholarships and bursaries for students to mitigate the increased financial burden, as it had said it would if fee deregulation was introduced.

    In response, Spence said, “the University will be worse-off financially under this budget,” unlike under fee deregulation.

    He said earlier in the meeting, “Our more disadvantaged students would have been better off” under fee deregulation because it would, in some dubious logic, have provided more money for scholarships.

    academic board budget fees Spence Vice Chancellor

    Keep Reading

    Strawmanning in the chat at the July SRC Council

    MAPW addresses USyd’s retreat from “obligation to promote peace” in open letter

    Antisemitism review puts universities, festivals, and cultural centres under threat

    Macquarie University axes Sociology, cuts more jobs & courses

    UTS elects new Chancellor

    Jason Clare seeks replacement for ANU Chancellor Julie Bishop after $790,000 expense report

    Just In

    Strawmanning in the chat at the July SRC Council

    July 14, 2025

    Folk Reimagined, East In Symphony at the Sydney Opera House

    July 14, 2025

    Graeme Turner’s ‘Broken’ assesses our ailing university sector

    July 13, 2025

    MAPW addresses USyd’s retreat from “obligation to promote peace” in open letter

    July 13, 2025
    Editor's Picks

    Part One: The Tale of the Corporate University

    May 28, 2025

    “Thank you Conspiracy!” says Capitalism, as it survives another day

    May 21, 2025

    A meditation on God and the impossible pursuit of answers

    May 14, 2025

    We Will Be Remembered As More Than Administrative Errors

    May 7, 2025
    Facebook Instagram X (Twitter) TikTok

    From the mines

    • News
    • Analysis
    • Higher Education
    • Culture
    • Features
    • Investigation
    • Comedy
    • Editorials
    • Letters
    • Misc

     

    • Opinion
    • Perspective
    • Profiles
    • Reviews
    • Science
    • Social
    • Sport
    • SRC Reports
    • Tech

    Admin

    • About
    • Editors
    • Send an Anonymous Tip
    • Write/Produce/Create For Us
    • Print Edition
    • Locations
    • Archive
    • Advertise in Honi Soit
    • Contact Us

    We acknowledge the traditional custodians of this land, the Gadigal people of the Eora Nation. The University of Sydney – where we write, publish and distribute Honi Soit – is on the sovereign land of these people. As students and journalists, we recognise our complicity in the ongoing colonisation of Indigenous land. In recognition of our privilege, we vow to not only include, but to prioritise and centre the experiences of Indigenous people, and to be reflective when we fail to be a counterpoint to the racism that plagues the mainstream media.

    © 2025 Honi Soit
    • Privacy Policy
    • Terms
    • Accessibility

    Type above and press Enter to search. Press Esc to cancel.