Close Menu
Honi Soit
    Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram
    Trending
    • Everything is Alive at Slowdive
    • The Conspiracy of Free Will
    • Red-Haired Phantasies: The So-Called Manic Pixie Dream Girl
    • The Case for Psychoanalysis
    •  “I’m not really a flat Earther, it’s just my alter ego.”
    • How I turned Honi into a Lesbian Cult
    • Conspiracy: Kylie Minogue never actually died
    • Chronocracies; Who Owns Time?
    • About
    • Print Edition
    • Student Journalism Conference 2025
    • Writing Comp
    • Advertise
    • Locations
    • Contact
    Facebook Instagram X (Twitter) TikTok
    Honi SoitHoni Soit
    Wednesday, May 21
    • News
    • Analysis
    • Culture
    • Opinion
    • University
    • Features
    • Perspective
    • Investigation
    • Reviews
    • Comedy
    • Student Journalism Conference 2025
    Honi Soit
    Home»News

    Court throws out student’s “largely unintelligible” pleas to continue degree

    A student was kicked out from their degree. They wanted to continue it. The University said no. A legal drama ensues.
    By Alan ZhengOctober 28, 2019 News 4 Mins Read
    Share
    Facebook Twitter LinkedIn Pinterest Email

    A former PhD student’s last-ditch bid to continue her degree has been refused by the Supreme Court, bookending four years of prolonged courtroom maneuvering with the student ordered to cover the University’s legal costs. 

    Susan Nandutu, an international student from Uganda, was studying a Doctor of Philosophy (Medicine) within the University of Sydney Medical School in 2015 when the University kicked her out of the PhD program.

    She had sought a semester-long suspension of the degree in 2012 in order to care for her critically ill mother in Uganda. The Faculty of Medicine refused to grant the suspension and terminated her candidature in the PhD program.

    She successfully appealed the termination to the University’s final stop for academic appeals — the Student Appeals Body (SAB) — and was reinstated in the degree. But these fortunes were brief.

    The Faculty demanded that she demonstrate why she should be permitted to continue the degree. She did so, but was once again terminated from the program for reasons not on the public record. 

    She appealed the decision but this time, her SAB appeal failed. She was out of the degree for good.

    In a flurry of legal claims from 2015 onwards, Nandutu urged the Supreme Court to review and overturn the SAB’s decision to terminate her candidature. She said the University had defamed her, breached its duty of care and further breached its contractual obligations, causing her close to $800,000 in economic loss.

    She also contended that the University terminated her participation in the PhD program on the basis of a falsified academic record. 

    When she attempted to have senior University staff, including Associate Professor Peter McCallum, provide further information on staff members responsible for supervising and monitoring her candidature, the court refused her request.

    These claims came to a head last year when the court gave the self-represented Nandutu “a final attempt to get things right” after she breached court procedure on several occasions. It appears, however, little has changed since then. 

    Nandutu, still without pro bono legal representation or legal aid, was swiftly outgunned by the University’s top-tier legal firepower who argued that her case was embarrassing, “vague and largely unintelligible” and plagued by technical errors. 

    “To a significant extent, they are difficult to comprehend,” the presiding judge said of Nandutu’s arguments, in the court’s judgment.

    “They are scandalous to the extent that they include allegations of ethical and criminal misconduct by lawyers for the University without any evidentiary basis.”

    “[The proceedings] represent a seemingly never-ending and continually inept attempt to plead claims that remain opaque, to put it mildly.” 

    On those grounds, the Supreme Court said Nandutu’s case was an abuse of process and prevented her from commencing proceedings on her termination in the future.

    Up to this point, the proceedings had been hampered by several delays. Although Nandutu was initially assisted by pro bono lawyers, they withdrew their help after several months. 

    A hearing was adjourned earlier this year when Nandutu became unwell and paramedics were called to the courtroom.

    All this means the University racked up a hefty legal bill which would otherwise be borne by Nandutu.

    However, an official University spokesperson confirmed it would not seek to enforce any costs orders, leaving the University to pick up its own legal bills.

    The sum of lawyers fees accrued by the University is not yet known.

    “We strongly deny any wrongdoing in relation to the various claims that this individual has brought against the University, and note the manner in which these claims have been pursued has led to increased costs,” said the spokesperson.

    After her candidature was terminated, Nandutu suffered from stress and was recommended treatment from a clinical psychologist, according to medical certificates seen by the court. 

    There is some precedent to the University fighting prolonged court cases against students but Nandutu’s case is the longest single case against an individual student known to Honi.

    The NSW Civil and Administrative Tribunal dismissed a student’s complaints of race and sex discrimination earlier this year.

    Nandutu could not be reached for comment.

    Medicine Student Appeals Body

    Keep Reading

    NSW paramedics ordered to halt industrial action over mental health pilot program

    Unions call on federal government to intervene against Santos’ Narrabri Gas Project

    “Every penny of our tuition fee becomes a missile fired at Palestinians”: Students vote against new definition of antisemitism at SGM

    I like my Lower House shaken, not stirred: LNP and Greens look to new leadership

    2025 USU Board Election Provisional Results Announced

    77 Years of Nakba: Thousands protest in Sydney against Israel’s Occupation

    Just In

    Everything is Alive at Slowdive

    May 21, 2025

    The Conspiracy of Free Will

    May 21, 2025

    Red-Haired Phantasies: The So-Called Manic Pixie Dream Girl

    May 21, 2025

    The Case for Psychoanalysis

    May 21, 2025
    Editor's Picks

    A meditation on God and the impossible pursuit of answers

    May 14, 2025

    We Will Be Remembered As More Than Administrative Errors

    May 7, 2025

    NSW universities in the red as plague of cuts hit students & staff

    April 30, 2025

    Your Compliance Will Not Save You

    April 16, 2025
    Facebook Instagram X (Twitter) TikTok

    From the mines

    • News
    • Analysis
    • Higher Education
    • Culture
    • Features
    • Investigation
    • Comedy
    • Editorials
    • Letters
    • Misc

     

    • Opinion
    • Perspective
    • Profiles
    • Reviews
    • Science
    • Social
    • Sport
    • SRC Reports
    • Tech

    Admin

    • About
    • Editors
    • Send an Anonymous Tip
    • Write/Produce/Create For Us
    • Print Edition
    • Locations
    • Archive
    • Advertise in Honi Soit
    • Contact Us

    We acknowledge the traditional custodians of this land, the Gadigal people of the Eora Nation. The University of Sydney – where we write, publish and distribute Honi Soit – is on the sovereign land of these people. As students and journalists, we recognise our complicity in the ongoing colonisation of Indigenous land. In recognition of our privilege, we vow to not only include, but to prioritise and centre the experiences of Indigenous people, and to be reflective when we fail to be a counterpoint to the racism that plagues the mainstream media.

    © 2025 Honi Soit
    • Privacy Policy
    • Terms
    • Accessibility

    Type above and press Enter to search. Press Esc to cancel.