Close Menu
Honi Soit
    Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram
    Trending
    • I like my Lower House shaken, not stirred: LNP and Greens look to new leadership
    • 2025 USU Board Election Provisional Results Announced
    • 77 Years of Nakba: Thousands protest in Sydney against Israel’s Occupation
    • جذوري my roots
    • Patterns of a War-Torn Conscience: Towards a Healing Conceptualisation of Praxis
    • Enmore Psychogeography
    • The night has its own logic
    • Yield
    • About
    • Print Edition
    • Student Journalism Conference 2025
    • Writing Comp
    • Advertise
    • Locations
    • Contact
    Facebook Instagram X (Twitter) TikTok
    Honi SoitHoni Soit
    Saturday, May 17
    • News
    • Analysis
    • Culture
    • Opinion
    • University
    • Features
    • Perspective
    • Investigation
    • Reviews
    • Comedy
    • Student Journalism Conference 2025
    Honi Soit
    Home»Analysis

    Privacy concerns raised over exam provider, ProctorU

    Students are up in arms.
    By Robbie MasonMarch 29, 2020 Analysis 4 Mins Read
    Share
    Facebook Twitter LinkedIn Pinterest Email

    The University of Sydney’s choice  to use third-party contractor, ProctorU, for online exams has caused widespread outrage amongst students who fear the ways the software (read: spyware) invades privacy. 

    Downloading the software for ProctorU gives offshore proctors access to personal information and data on students’ computers. Though ProctorU claims it “does not use any student’s personal information for any reason other than the proctoring of online exams,” proctors can access far more information if they so choose, since sitting through an exam with ProctorU involves handing over control of personal computers to proctors. 

    The company also claims that it “never sells any personal information to third parties,” but in its privacy policy it acknowledges it may sell or transfer information collected from students in the event of a “bankruptcy, merger, acquisition, reorganization, or sale of assets.” That information includes students’ name, email address, educational institution, phone number, country of residence, IP address, internet service provider, browser extensions and video and audio recordings of the examination. 

    When using ProctorU’s services, students must present an ID card on camera. ProctorU uses the image from this ID card in conjunction with biometric facial recognition software to confirm a user’s identity. ProctorU may monitor online exams live with a proctor via webcam but the process can also be automated via technology that tracks and records eye movement, noise and keystrokes. Users must then download a program, LogMeInRescue, to obtain “remote support” from a technician. Proctoru disables the screenshot function, the copy and paste function and all sounds outputs (aside from verbal instructions from proctors), takes control of your mouse, turns off any running apps and prevents you from opening new internet tabs or windows.

    Users have described having to show a 360 degree view of their bedroom, including each corner of the room in which they sit the exam, as well as the spaces under desks and on the floor. One user reported doing the exam on his bed after his desk was considered too cluttered. This involved removing the bed sheets to prove that no materials for cheating were lying nearby.  

    Unsurprisingly then, students have heavily criticised the proposal. Our email inbox at Honi has been inundated with messages from concerned USyd students, one of whom wrote “a person in their right mind wouldn’t ordinarily tolerate this level of privacy breach.” 

    In a statement to Honi, however, the University stood by its position to use ProctorU. “We’re confident ProctorU will be able to fulfil our exam needs, given the platform’s ongoing and similar work with many universities globally. However, if we do experience any technical or other issues we’ll work hard to manage and mitigate any potential impacts as the particular circumstances demand.” 

    More than 1000 institutions, including hundreds of universities, use ProctorU, raising ethical questions around the broader normalisation of privacy breaches. In 2019, Australia was downgraded by global research organisation CIVICUS Monitor from an “open” to a “narrow” democracy, in part due to severe limits on press freedom and whistleblowing. Mandatory metadata retention laws were introduced in 2015 with bipartisan support. The Greens, minor parties and academics have criticised these moves, highlighting the numerous ways in which law enforcement agencies have abused and stretched the boundaries of these laws since their introduction. 

    These moves come despite a lack of evidence for growing terrorism threats and statistics which indicate that crime rates have lowered across every major category over the last forty years in New South Wales, except for sexual assault and domestic violence. Clearly, powerful institutions care more about authoritarian regulation than protecting civil rights.

    Students need not blindly follow a status quo that erodes our right to privacy and commodifies our personal information. We need to push for alternatives to ProductU: take home exams, online assignments or suspension of exams for some units altogether. The University has previously been more responsive to student complaints over invasions of privacy. In 2017, the University decided against adopting cheating detection software Cadmus, which would have analysed keystroke patterns on students computers. Security concerns have also caused companies like Amazon — no champion of workers’ right to privacy — to abandon their use of ProctorU. Perhaps this gives us hope that USyd too may cave into the demands of (what the university hierarchy views as) customers, or think twice before using ProctorU in future. 

    online exams proctoru usyd

    Keep Reading

    Remember Me

    Genuine Help or a Band-aid Fix? An Assessment of Early Feedback Tasks

    Time Machines: The Architecture on Campus

    Capitalism Won’t Save You

    Your Therapist Is Not Your Messiah

    From Critique to Care: Rethinking Our Faith in Our Youth

    Just In

    I like my Lower House shaken, not stirred: LNP and Greens look to new leadership

    May 17, 2025

    2025 USU Board Election Provisional Results Announced

    May 16, 2025

    77 Years of Nakba: Thousands protest in Sydney against Israel’s Occupation

    May 16, 2025

    جذوري my roots

    May 16, 2025
    Editor's Picks

    A meditation on God and the impossible pursuit of answers

    May 14, 2025

    We Will Be Remembered As More Than Administrative Errors

    May 7, 2025

    NSW universities in the red as plague of cuts hit students & staff

    April 30, 2025

    Your Compliance Will Not Save You

    April 16, 2025
    Facebook Instagram X (Twitter) TikTok

    From the mines

    • News
    • Analysis
    • Higher Education
    • Culture
    • Features
    • Investigation
    • Comedy
    • Editorials
    • Letters
    • Misc

     

    • Opinion
    • Perspective
    • Profiles
    • Reviews
    • Science
    • Social
    • Sport
    • SRC Reports
    • Tech

    Admin

    • About
    • Editors
    • Send an Anonymous Tip
    • Write/Produce/Create For Us
    • Print Edition
    • Locations
    • Archive
    • Advertise in Honi Soit
    • Contact Us

    We acknowledge the traditional custodians of this land, the Gadigal people of the Eora Nation. The University of Sydney – where we write, publish and distribute Honi Soit – is on the sovereign land of these people. As students and journalists, we recognise our complicity in the ongoing colonisation of Indigenous land. In recognition of our privilege, we vow to not only include, but to prioritise and centre the experiences of Indigenous people, and to be reflective when we fail to be a counterpoint to the racism that plagues the mainstream media.

    © 2025 Honi Soit
    • Privacy Policy
    • Terms
    • Accessibility

    Type above and press Enter to search. Press Esc to cancel.